Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 81.2 against 72. The Motorola Edge 50 is a noticeably newer and a bit thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is just a little heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features and optimized performance.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a slightly better 1220 x 2712px resolution, a bit larger display, a little more pixels per inch of screen and more display brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 has improved battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4025mAh. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.