Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Moto G Stylus's body is just a little bit heavier and thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Stylus has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, providing a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Moto G Stylus counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro and Moto G Stylus both have very similar batteries, although the Moto G Stylus has a 1% lower battery capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a larger camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.