Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 76.4 against 72. Moto Z Force Droid Edition is an way older cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger number of 2200 MHz cores and more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a very superior camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much higher resolution camera. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 15 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.