Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a global score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is an extremely older phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is extremely thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite lower pixels count per screen inch and a little worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size. OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos, a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.