Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play is just a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 77.4 against 72. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is an noticeably older phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat lighter and much thinner anyway. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a little bit greater pixel density.
Moto Z2 Play features much more storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.