Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 79.8 score against 72. The Motorola Moto Z4 is an older phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Motorola managed to make it just a bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Moto Z4, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better camera than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a larger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels camera.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.