Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 80.3 against 72. The Galaxy A12 construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both devices we are comparing use the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a processing unit that's just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A12 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better number of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations. The Galaxy A12 counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A12 has improved battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.