Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with Android 10 OS. Even though Galaxy A32 is newer than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it is heavier and thicker. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a much higher screen pixels density.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.