Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a general score of 82.3, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, giving you some extra features. Samsung Galaxy A60's body is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, although both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit higher screen pixel density and a bit larger screen.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more MP and a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A60 and OPPO Reno3 Pro feature extremely similar storage capacity for games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.