Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a global score of 84.2, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s construction is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just 17 months before. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a better number of pixels per inch of display, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) count with incredibly similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better video resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 22 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.