Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a score of 91.8 against 72. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G design has the same thickness than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is a little bit heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have a same size sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same (4K) video definition and the same camera aperture. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.