Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a general score of 84.9 against 72. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Galaxy A80 is an older, somewhat thicker and way heavier phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a quite higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A80's processor is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both of them have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A80's memory for apps and games is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, both have the same internal storage. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a much more megapixels back camera and a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.