Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a score of 90.5 against 72. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, and OPPO Reno3 Pro comes with Android 10 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior storage to install games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with way more megapixels and a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.