Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 81 score against 72. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is a little heavier and was released 3 years before. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit larger display and a just a little higher display pixels density.
OPPO Reno3 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a larger camera aperture. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit more memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro and Galaxy C9 Pro have similar batteries duration, although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a 1 percent lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.