Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a general score of 83.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M30s is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, we must highlight that it is also a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy M30s's processor is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's CPU, and although the Galaxy M30s has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a much more megapixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy M30s features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M30s features a much better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.