Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy M31 is a just a little thicker and just a little heavier phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and much more brightness.
Samsung Galaxy M31's camera is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both have the same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video definition, a same size camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera sensor size. The Galaxy M31 has a greater storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M31 counts with a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.