Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ1 has a score of 78.3, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. The Sony Xperia XZ1 is an extremely older cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. Sony Xperia XZ1 features a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a sharper display than Sony Xperia XZ1, because although it has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Xperia XZ1 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better camera than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much higher resolution camera in the back, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.