Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's a lot thinner and incredibly newer. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the newer 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a more vivid display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a really brighter screen, a bit higher pixels amount in each inch of display, a bigger screen and a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture, a lot better video quality and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.