Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 76.4 score against 72. Xiaomi Mi 5s is a somewhat lighter cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but both are 0.32inches thick. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 5s has 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen, a much brighter display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations.
OPPO Reno3 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 5s count with similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 26% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.