Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 85.5 score against 72. Although it's the best we compare here, it must be told that it is also older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way brighter display, a little bit higher pixels density, a little bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little faster processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery lifetime is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's battery life, although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.