Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having an 84.9 score against 72.1. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, the iPhone 11 Pro is an older, just a bit thicker and heavier device than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. The iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 OS.
IPhone 11 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little more pixels per display inch. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a superior memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a superior performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with improved battery life than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much better photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures, a much better resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.