Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a general score of 85 against 72.1. Even though iPhone 8 is much older than OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's construction is a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better display than iPhone 8, because it has a way larger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit greater display pixels density and way more brightness.
IPhone 8 counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 8 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior camera than iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a way better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.