Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a score of 80.3 against 72.1. Google Nexus 6P is a noticeably older and a little bit heavier phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but Google could make it a little bit thinner anyway. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit lower pixels amount per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a bigger sensor and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Google Nexus 6P has as much storage capacity for applications and games as OPPO Reno4 Pro, both have the same internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.