Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a overall score of 81.6 against 72.1. Google Pixel 2 is a way older and just a little thicker phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but Google managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway. OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture.
OPPO Reno4 Pro and Google Pixel 2 both count with extremely similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have equal internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.