Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Even being the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also a lot older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite lower pixel density and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Google Pixel XL counts with as much storage for games and applications as the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.