Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a global score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. LG V30's design is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. The LG V30 and OPPO Reno4 Pro both count with similar processors, and although the LG V30 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features just a bit better looking display than LG V30, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per display inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The LG V30 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features improved battery duration than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.