Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. LG V50 ThinQ is an older, heavier and a bit thicker device than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a slightly better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ and OPPO Reno4 Pro feature extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.