Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is slightly better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 76.4 score against 72.1. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a couple additional features. Despite being the best device in this comparison, the Motorola Droid Turbo design is way older, thicker and just a bit heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a GPU. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3% bigger battery size.
OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.