Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a global score of 79.7 against 72.1. Despite being the best phone in this review, we must tell that it is also a thicker and somewhat heavier phone. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Stylus has a newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus. Both have a same size aperture, a same resolution camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor. Motorola Moto G Stylus has much more memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the OPPO Reno4 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.