Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 has an overall score of 80.3, which is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. The Galaxy A12 body is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should provide you the same OS features.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way higher (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy A12 has superior battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.