Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a global score of 84.7 against 72.1. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A32 is a somewhat thicker and extremely heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 operating system.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a way better display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger aperture for better photos in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features greater battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.