Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has an overall score of 82.3, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. The Galaxy A60 body is older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A60 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen.
OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 features as much storage to install games and applications as the OPPO Reno4 Pro, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has an 18% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.