Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's general score of 72.1. The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a a little bit heavier device than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.