Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The Galaxy A71 5G's processor is very similar to OPPO Reno4 Pro's processing unit, and although the Galaxy A71 5G has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.