Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 Star is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a overall score of 82.1 against 72.1. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but Galaxy A8 Star has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides you lots of additional features. Galaxy A8 Star's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it is somewhat heavier.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star features a better storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 400 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has an 8 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.