Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a 90.5 score against 72.1. Galaxy A90 5G is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, we must note that it's also older, just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, while OPPO Reno4 Pro works with Android 10 operating system.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A90 5G's camera is just as good as the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size sensor, a same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.