Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is just a little thinner than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it's heavier and was released 4 years before. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit better pixels count in each inch in the display. Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy C9 Pro's battery life is just as good as OPPO Reno4 Pro's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.