Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M30s has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Galaxy M30s construction is older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a little bit larger display, a quite greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 48 MP, the same video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a bigger aperture. The Galaxy M30s counts with a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.