Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Even though Galaxy Note9 is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, we must note that it is also an older, thicker and heavier cellphone. OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit lower pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note9 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note9's battery life is just as good as the battery performance in OPPO Reno4 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.