Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 has an overall score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's general score of 72.1. Xperia XZ2 is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, it must be told that it's also an extremely older, heavier and notably thicker phone. The Xperia XZ2 has a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Xperia XZ2, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a lot brighter display and a bit larger screen. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Xperia XZ2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution, a larger back camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Xperia XZ2 has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.