Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 77.8 score against 72.1. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a newer and much thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it's also notably heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more vivid screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a way higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a quite better number of pixels in each display inch, a much brighter display and a bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a more mega pixels back facing camera, a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.