Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 global score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a quite better pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a lot brighter screen and a quite bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both have 8 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery duration is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one. OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture for better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.