Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is much better than OPPO Reno5 Pro's 71.9 score. The LG V30 body is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than LG V30, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display. OPPO Reno5 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
LG V30 features a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno5 Pro has improved battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 4350mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.