Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting an 83.7 score against 71.9. The LG V50 ThinQ is a better device than OPPO Reno5 Pro, it must be told that it is also an older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier device. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and OPPO Reno5 Pro has Android 11.
OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse display density and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a bit better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4350mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.