Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting a 91.8 score against 71.9. Despite being the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the OPPO Reno5 Pro. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno5 Pro has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better camera than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates and a back camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno5 Pro, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.