Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Astral Blue and Starry Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A77 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4350mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is way better than the OPPO Reno5 Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 71.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a better phone than OPPO Reno5 Pro, it must be told that it is also an extremely older, thicker and heavier phone. The Galaxy Note9 features a little better processing power than OPPO Reno5 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit worse pixels density and a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno5 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno5 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno5 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno5 Pro features a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4350mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.