Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is much better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 85 against 77. The Apple iPhone 8 body is just a bit thinner and lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The iPhone 8 has a bit faster processor than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and 10 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little bit better display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400, more display brightness, a just a bit better pixels number per inch in the display and a much bigger screen. The iPhone 8's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture. IPhone 8 features a very superior battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.