Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having an 84.5 score against 77. The iPhone XS Max design has the same thickness than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but it's somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone XS Max has just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has much darker screen, and they both have a screen of the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
IPhone XS Max counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone XS Max features a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.