Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a score of 81.6 against 77. Google Pixel 2 is a somewhat lighter but just a bit thicker phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.