Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ features a display that is very similar to OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's screen, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.